How We Hire Writers

custom writing

All applicants go through a series of tests that check their level of English and knowledge of formatting styles. The applicant is also required to present a sample of writing to the Evaluation Department. If you wish to find out more about the procedure, check out the whole process.

How We Ensure Quality

Our Quality Control Department checks every single order for formatting, style, word usage, and authenticity. This lets us deliver certified assignment assistance that has no Internet rivals.

Any topic (writer’s choice)

Objective: To be able to identify the strengths and WEAKNESSES of a research article

            Select one primary source on your topic. Carefully read the article and write a scholarly critique on the research conducted. Specifically address both strengths and weaknesses in terms of research methodology. Critique only the selected major points (you do not need to be complete). Keep your critique within three pages. Attach a photocopy of the article.

            It is important, when completing this assignment, that you use the knowledge you learned in this class to evaluate the weaknesses of the study. The evaluations need to be specific. Cite the knowledge you learned in this class to support your evaluation. Avoid using subjective words such as feel, believe, etc. in your paper. As an incomplete guideline, the following are listed to guide and to stimulate your thinking on this project. DO NOT evaluate more than three weaknesses):

            Purpose: Is the purpose clearly stated?

            Hypotheses: Clearly stated? Concepts operationally defined (you may find the operational definition in the method section)?

            Subjects: Detailed described? Represent the population (judged from sampling procedures)?

            Materials: Valid and reliable?

            Procedures: Clearly described and detailed enough? Possible confounding factors? Other weaknesses of the design?

            Result: Descriptive statistics reported? Inferential statistics reported? Detailed enough? Consistent with the purpose and the hypotheses?

            Discussion: Major findings and problems discussed? Possible bias (e.g., subjective statements?)? Any other possible explanations?

            Conclusion: Simple and clear? Overgeneralizations? Biases?

USE THE ARTICLE I PROVIDED

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes