How We Hire Writers

custom writing

All applicants go through a series of tests that check their level of English and knowledge of formatting styles. The applicant is also required to present a sample of writing to the Evaluation Department. If you wish to find out more about the procedure, check out the whole process.

How We Ensure Quality

Our Quality Control Department checks every single order for formatting, style, word usage, and authenticity. This lets us deliver certified assignment assistance that has no Internet rivals.

ECON305-DB-4

Site all sources and data. APA Format. 3-4 Paragraphs

https://youtu.be/DmlhHLLU3Xs

This is from March 2010, thus, some data is out of date.  However, the point of the video is to help you make the connections between the recent/current economic policies and the events of 1937.

The Topic:
The Great Depression was a low probability event.  It required several negative economic events to occur at the same time.  And for policy makers to respond poorly to those events.  One of the best books on this topic is John Kenneth Gailbraith’s The Great Crash, you might want to read it.

The events of 1937 are largely forgotten, even by economists.  But for those who study the relationships between public policy and economic growth, the lessons of 1937 are some of the most important ones from the 20th century.

Table 7.2 page 232 of your text show GDP grow of 12.8% in 1936.  In 1937 it was 6.9% and by 1938 it was -5.5%.  How does an economy go from the strong growth (admittedly from a relatively low base) of 1936 to another recession by 1938?  In this case the answer is government policy.

For this week’s discussion, go on the web and/or to the library and learn the specific monetary and fiscal policy changes (don’t forget taxes) that occurred in 1937.  Use what you have learned about GDP, production costs and aggregate demand and aggregate supply to project the most likely results of those changes.

Next view the current economic condition of the United States and the recently proposed tax increases, the ending of the Federal Reserve’s Quantitative Easing and the proposals for increased government spending that may or may not be offset by spending cuts in other areas.  What do you think is the most likely result?

In other words, compare 2015 – 2020 to 1937 and explore what lessons and cautions may be learned from that comparison.

Think in terms of an economic policy advisor.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes