Choose one of those paragraphs and explain if the paragraph is coherent. Here is a example for a review of the movie Easy Rider.

“Hopper and Fonda spent much of the rest of their lives squabblingboth in print and in courtover credit for dreaming up its story. According to Fonda, the pair plotted most of the film together, sitting out on Fondas tennis court, while his daughter, Bridget, pedaled her tricycle around them. Hopper (less credibly) liked to claim that he wrote the entire thing himself in 10 days. Considering how thin the plot is, its hard to see what they were getting so worked up about. The film follows two buddies, played by Fonda and Hopper, who strike it rich in a drug deal and then use the proceeds to motorcycle across the country to Mardi Gras, meeting colorful charactershippies, rednecks, an ACLU lawyeralong the way. After dropping acid in a graveyard with two prostitutes, the duo set out eastward again, only to be shot dead by hillbillies on the highway.”

This paragraph is somewhat coherent. The first part develops the claim that the actors Dennis Hopper and Peter Fonda “squabbled” and follows with their claims about writing the movie. But then there is a shift to another point and that is that the plot of the movie is “thin.” This could be seen as shifting to a new point, but this is somewhat relevant to the first part of the paragraph because it develops the notion that the squabble was unnecessary.