How We Hire Writers

custom writing

All applicants go through a series of tests that check their level of English and knowledge of formatting styles. The applicant is also required to present a sample of writing to the Evaluation Department. If you wish to find out more about the procedure, check out the whole process.

How We Ensure Quality

Our Quality Control Department checks every single order for formatting, style, word usage, and authenticity. This lets us deliver certified assignment assistance that has no Internet rivals.

Controversial Topics in Human Services

Controversial Topics in Human Services
Research published viewpoints, found in no fewer than two scholarly sources or other credible sources, regarding the pros and cons of legalization of marijuana from the perspective of the human services discipline and profession. Based on these sources, your required readings on controversial issues and marijuana legalization, and reflections on your values and ethics, write an initial post to the forum identifying and evaluating one or more implications of this issue for the provision of human services.

Then, apply these reflections to a fictional or real (if you happen to know of one) case study concerning a human services client who is a heavy marijuana user. Specify gender, age, and related environmental and personal issues and circumstances, such as: Is this a legalized state? Is the clients use related to a medical and/or psychological need? How is the client claiming to get the money for the marijuana?

In your initial post, address the following:

Describe how the issue of legalization and its controversial character affect your professional responsibilities broadly and your practice with regard to the client.
Provide one or more examples describing how you, as a human services provider, would act in response to specific scenarios that might come up in practice, assessing how social factors, legal factors, and/or the larger moral context might create tensions or conflict with respect to values.
Tie in this scenario (or scenarios) with conceptual discussions and arguments put forth in your sources, describing how your (fictional or actual) experience is informed and explained by the literature and this week’s readings.
In your responses to no fewer than two of your peers, compare and contrast your cases, commenting on how similar and/or divergent analyses apply in each case.

Review Section 1.3: Writing for an Audience, Section 3.3: Narrowing the Topic and Developing a Focus, and Section 5.3: Ensuring the Conclusions Match the Type of Data Collected, from Sole’s and Landrums (2015) Academic Research and Writing: A Guide for the Social Sciences.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes