How We Hire Writers

custom writing

All applicants go through a series of tests that check their level of English and knowledge of formatting styles. The applicant is also required to present a sample of writing to the Evaluation Department. If you wish to find out more about the procedure, check out the whole process.

How We Ensure Quality

Our Quality Control Department checks every single order for formatting, style, word usage, and authenticity. This lets us deliver certified assignment assistance that has no Internet rivals.

Ethical Decisions

Major Assignment #1 Instructions: Ethical Decision

For this assignment, your task will be to make a decision about how to solve an ethical problem for your company by considering several options and then looking at pros and cons for each of those options. 

Step #1: Brainstorm and Prepare Your Ideas                                                                                                          

You will receive an ethical problem.  For this problem, you need to brainstorm at least three possible options to solve this problem (option 1, option 2, option 3 etc.).  Then, for each of these options, you need to analyze them to determine what are the possible pros (advantages) and cons (risks) for each option.

Option 1:                           

Explanation Pros Cons

Option 2:                              

Explanation Pros Cons

Option 3:                                

Explanation Pros Cons   

Step #2: Make a decision     

You have to choose among the 3 options that you were given. However, if you can think of a 4th better option than the 3 you were given you are free to do so. 

Step #3: Justify your decision   

In a 10-15 minute presentation, you will have to explain and justify why you chose one of those solutions. 

You must submit your assignments by Wednesday May4th.

(Students, who follow the course asynchronously by watching the videos and those who cannot present due to technical issues, can do a written report of 750-1000 words APA format)

Problem

David Tovar is the spokesperson for our company We are considering promoting him to Senior Vice-President.  We have to decide whether to promote him or not. David started at our company 20 years ago He said he had a university degree when he applied for the job (20 years ago) We did background check and found out he doesnt have a degree.   We talked to him and he says he never graduated from university but thought it wasnt a problem after he got the job. He never told anyone about this until we asked him as part of this process

Option #1:  Fire David                                                                                                                                                   

We should tell David that we appreciate everything he has done for our company for 20 years, but we have to fire him to set a precedent and a strong example for other staff.

Option #2: Promote David with a Warning                                                                                                              

We can tell David that we will give him a break this one time because of his 20 years of good work.  We will give him a formal warning that must go on his file and if there is any evidence of any other unethical behaviour, he will be fired.

Option #3: Give David a Warning but No Promotion

We will tell David that he can remain as the head spokesperson for our company, but he will not be able to get a senior executive position because of his lie when joining the company

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes