How We Hire Writers

custom writing

All applicants go through a series of tests that check their level of English and knowledge of formatting styles. The applicant is also required to present a sample of writing to the Evaluation Department. If you wish to find out more about the procedure, check out the whole process.

How We Ensure Quality

Our Quality Control Department checks every single order for formatting, style, word usage, and authenticity. This lets us deliver certified assignment assistance that has no Internet rivals.

Any topic (writer’s choice)

740.1.4 : Professional Accountability
The graduate analyzes the responsibilities and accountability of the professional nurse.
740.1.5 : Self Advocacy of the Nurse
The graduate integrates strategies of self-awareness and self-care into professional practice to ensure personal health and well-being.
740.1.7 : Roles of the Nurse
The graduate analyzes the roles of the nurse as a scientist, a detective, and a manager of the healing environment.
740.1.10 : The Nursing Profession
The graduate applies historical and contemporary nursing theories and models to define their professional nursing practice.
740.1.13 : The Professional Nurse
The graduate integrates knowledge, skills, and attitudes of the nursing profession into personal and professional interactions and ethical decision making.
740.1.15 : Healthcare Work Environment
The graduate evaluates how the vision, values, mission, and philosophy of an organization align with an individuals professional values, beliefs, and approaches to inter-professional collegiality.
Introduction

The purpose of this task is to explore how nursing ethics, self-advocacy, and professional accountability can be applied in clinical practice. Using the provided case scenario, you will be required to think about how ethical concepts can be used to make clinical decisions and explore the differences in personal and professional beliefs. You will develop personalized stress management plans that rely on the use of adaptive coping strategies to ensure personal health and well-being.

Scenario

You have been working as a nurse in the adult oncology unit for the past year. You have developed a close relationship with many of your patients, but Mr. Newcomb has a special place in your heart. He has been diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer and has undergone aggressive chemotherapy. Each day his wife has come to the unit to be with her husband. They have been married for over 40 years and share a deep love.

Mr. and Mrs. Newcomb have made the decision to no longer continue with treatment and have decided that hospice care is needed. Over the past few days, you have watched Mr. Newcombs health decline, and you can tell from your experience that he does not have much time left to live. Mr. Newcomb has been very open about discussing his death, and you have had the opportunity to learn about his life and the legacy he will leave behind.

While you are completing your rounds, you stop in Mr. Newcombs room to see how he is doing. You ask, Is there anything else I can do for you? Mr. Newcomb has rarely asked for anything, but today he has one request. Mr. Newcomb states, Before I die, I would like to see my mistress one more time. Mrs. Newcomb is always here. Do you think you could tell her that I will be busy for a few hours tomorrow so I can make arrangements to see my mistress one more time?

Reflect on the following questions before you begin working on this task:
  What would you do in this scenario?
  How can your knowledge of ethical principles be utilized to determine your response to Mr. Newcomb?
  How would this affect you as a nurse and direct provider of care for Mr. Newcomb?

Requirements

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

A.  Summarize how the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice apply to the scenario by doing the following:
1.  Describe how you would respond to Mr. Newcombs request.
2.  Evaluate how you applied the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice to the scenario.
3.  Examine how personal beliefs and values influenced your response to the scenario.
4.  Describe three strategies to promote self-care.

B.  Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

C.  Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z
Rubric

A1: RESPONSE TO SCENARIO

Not Evident
A description is not provided, or the description makes no reference to how the candidate would respond to Mr. Newcombs request.

Approaching Competence
The description of how the candidate would respond to Mr. Newcombs request is irrelevant.

Competent
The description of how the candidate would respond to Mr. Newcombs request is relevant.
A2: APPLICATION OF PATIENT PRINCIPLES

Not Evident
An evaluation is not provided, or the evaluation makes no reference to how the candidate applied the given principles to the scenario.

Approaching Competence
The evaluation inaccurately addresses how the candidate applied the given principles to the scenario or is not supported.

Competent
The evaluation accurately addresses how the candidate applied the given principles to the scenario and is supported.
A3: PERSONAL BELIEFS AND VALUES

Not Evident
An examination is not provided, or the examination makes no reference to how personal beliefs and values influenced the candidates response to the clinical scenario.

Approaching Competence
The examination of how personal beliefs and values influenced the candidates response to the clinical scenario is irrelevant or not supported.

Competent
The examination of how personal beliefs and values influenced the candidates response to the clinical scenario is relevant and supported.
A4: PROMOTING SELF-CARE STRATEGIES

Not Evident
A description is not provided, or the description makes no reference to three strategies to promote self-care.

Approaching Competence
The description of three strategies to promote self-care is irrelevant.

Competent
The description of three strategies to promote self-care is relevant.
B: SOURCES

Not Evident
The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

Approaching Competence
The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized, and a reference list; however, the citations and/or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.

Competent
The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.
C: PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION

Not Evident
Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.

Approaching Competence
Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.

Competent
Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes