Below you will find a list of objectives for the assignment. Be sure to follow the directions outlined in Completing the Assignment carefully.

Objectives:

Find three secondary sources that are timely, useful, credible, and relevant to your primary source. Your work with these sources should help you revise and extend the work you completed in Step 1: Primary Source Analysis
At least TWO of your sources should be from a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal (we will discuss what this means in class)
Correctly use MLA Works Cited list format
Demonstrate the ability to comprehend the central arguments of these sources
Describe the sources relevance to your main argument
For each source, create a correctly formatted Works Cited entry in MLA style. See the MLA Handbook or the Purdue OWL (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/) for details
Getting Started:

Be sure that you understand the difference between a primary and a secondary source. See Who Says?, pg. 73-74 for help.
Keep in mind that research is not an exact science. Be patient and flexible throughout the process.
Employ the Shoreline Libraries website to find useful, timely, relevant, and credible electronic or print sources.
Completing the Assignment:

For each source, create a correctly formatted Works Cited entry in MLA style. See the MLA Handbook or the Purdue OWL (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/) for details.
After each entry, write a paragraph of at least 7-8 sentences that includes:
A description of the source (where it comes from, who wrote it, how a reader might determine its reliability, etc.)
A detailed summary of the authors main argument. For instance, dont simply say that an article is about personal confidence. What, specifically, does the article say about personal confidence?
An explanation of how the source relates to your argument. For instance, you might explain how this source supports, complicates, or disagrees with your claims, or you may describe which aspects of the sources argument relate to your argument.
Paper format requirements: Your annotations should be single-spaced, typed in 12-point font, and set to 1 margins.  See example papers if you need more clarity on how to format your paper.

***Instructions: my myth is overcoming / compensating (:
The person with a disability overcomes their impair- ment through hard work or has some special talent that offsets their deficiencies. Shapiro calls this figure the super crip.  for example: In Homer himself, we are to recognize a blind man who is a gifted poet and seer, his great memory and his story-weaving capabilities making up for his defect)

My primary source is “”butterfly circus” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7ni22kU8SM&t=902s

I have to do a tree secondary sources; I choice :

*  Wendy Chrisman, A Reflection on Inspiration

* J.L. Williams, Reality, Normality, Sexuality: Authentic Portrayals of the Freak

* Jessica Lindenberg, The Butterfly Circus: is Inspirational Positive or Negative?

https://culturesofdisability.wordpress.com/2017/02/15/the-butterfly-circus-is-inspirational-positive-or-negative-jessica-lindenberg/

*** there is Dolmage book where I choice my myth
* Dolmage, Jay Timothy. Interchapter: An Archive and Anatomy of Disability Myths. Disability Rhetoric. Syracuse University P, 2013, pp. 31-61 (This is from your readings)

I am going to attach the files below. for the third secondary source use this link:

https://culturesofdisability.wordpress.com/2017/02/15/the-butterfly-circus-is-inspirational-positive-or-negative-jessica-lindenberg/