How We Hire Writers

custom writing

All applicants go through a series of tests that check their level of English and knowledge of formatting styles. The applicant is also required to present a sample of writing to the Evaluation Department. If you wish to find out more about the procedure, check out the whole process.

How We Ensure Quality

Our Quality Control Department checks every single order for formatting, style, word usage, and authenticity. This lets us deliver certified assignment assistance that has no Internet rivals.

DatasetCodebook.pdf

Dataset Codebook BUS7105, Week 8

Name Source Representation Measurement Meaning

Subject’s Identification Number

Qualtrics Identification Number. Auto generated by Qualtrics software.

Anonymous identification of survey taker

N/A Sequential numbers in order of survey taker completion. Dataset organization purposes only.

Gender Self-reported by survey-taker: Survey Question #1

Survey-taker gender affiliation

Categorical, Dichotomous

1 = Female 2 = Male

Age Self-reported by survey-taker: Survey Question #2

Survey-taker reported age in years

Continuous, Scale Age in whole years.

Education Self-reported by survey-taker: Survey Question #3

Survey-taker education level

Categorical, Nominal 1 = High School Completion 2 = Bachelor’s degree Completion 3 = Master’s Degree Completion

Personality Self-reported by survey-taker: Average of Survey Questions: #4(Reverse Scored), 5, 6, 7 (Reverse Scored), 8, 9(Reverse Scored)

Composite score of Survey-taker degree of introversion to extroversion personality traits.

Likert scale 1 – 7, Interval*

1 = Survey Response: Highly Disagree (Introvert) To 7 = Highly Agree (Extrovert)

Job Satisfaction Self-reported by survey-taker: Average of Survey Questions: #10, 11, 12, 13

Composite score of Survey-taker satisfaction with their current job.

Likert scale 1 – 10, Interval

1 = Very Dissatisfied To 10 = Very Satisfied

Engagement Self-reported by survey-taker: Average of Survey Questions: #18, 19, 22(Reverse Scored)

Composite score of Survey-taker engagement in their current job.

Likert scale 1 – 7, Interval*

1 = Survey Response: Almost None of the Time (Very Low Engagement) To 7 = Survey Response: Almost All of the Time (Very High Engagement)

Trust in Leader Self-reported by survey-taker: Average of Survey Questions: # 15, 16, 17, 21

Composite score of Survey-taker trust in direct leader in their current job.

Likert scale 1 – 7, Interval*

1 = Survey Response: Almost None of the Time (Very Little Trust in Leader) To 7 = Survey Response: Almost All of the Time (Great Deal of Trust in Leader)

Motivation Self-reported by survey-taker: Average of Survey Questions: #14 (Reverse Scored), 20 (Reverse Scored), 23, 24, 25

Composite score of Survey-taker motivation in performing their current job.

Likert scale 1 – 7, Interval*

1 = Survey Response: Almost None of the Time (Not Motivated At All) To 7 = Survey Response: Almost All of the Time (Highly Motivation)

Intent to Quit Job Self-reported by survey-taker:

Composite score of Survey-taker intent to quit their current job.

Likert scale 1 – 7, Interval*

1 = Survey Response: Almost None of the Time (High Intent to Quit Job)

Average of Survey Questions: #26, 27, 28

To 7 = Survey Response: Almost All of the Time (Low Intent to Quit Job)

* Composite scores of multiple Likert scaled survey questions may be deemed interval in most situations. Exceptions include a single Likert

scaled survey question, scale range options less than 5, sample data that are not normally distributed, and certain variable characteristics

(Carifio & Perla, 2008; Sullivan & Artino, 2013). Measurement level assignment in SPSS is nominal, ordinal, and scale. Because meaningful

computations may be performed with interval data; SPSS assumes interval level variables as metric, and they are assigned to the scale

measurement level. See Measurement column in the Variable View tab.

Carifio, J., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education, 42(12), 1150 1152. https://doi-org.proxy1.ncu.edu/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03172.x Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R., Jr. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi-org.proxy1.ncu.edu/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes