APA format

1) Minimum 6 pages and one paragraph  (No word count per page)- Follow the 3 x 3 rule: minimum of three paragraphs per page

You must strictly comply with the number of paragraphs requested per page.

           Part 1:  2 pages and one paragraph

           Part 2: minimum  4 pages

   Submit 1 document per part

2)******APA norms

         All paragraphs must be narrative and cited in the text- each paragraph

         Bulleted responses are not accepted

         Don’t write in the first person 

         Don’t copy and paste the questions.

         Answer the question objectively, do not make introductions to your answers, answer it when you start the paragraph

Submit 1 document per part

3)****************************** It will be verified by Turnitin (Identify the percentage of exact match of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks) 

********************************It will be verified by SafeAssign (Identify the percentage of similarity of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)

4) Minimum 8 references (APA format) per part not older than 5 years  (Journals, books) (No websites)

All references must be consistent with the topic-purpose-focus of the parts. Different references are not allowed.

5) Identify your answer with the numbers, according to the question. Start your answer on the same line, not the next

Example:

Q 1. Nursing is XXXXX

Q 2. Health is XXXX

6) You must name the files according to the part you are answering: 

Example:

Part 1.doc 

Part 2.doc

__________________________________________________________________________________

Part 1: Outline

Question: Should gene-editing be abolished?

Position: Agree

Topic: Gene-editing  should be abolished

(1 paragraph)

1. Introduction: 

a. Phrase a question to hook the attention grabber. 

b. Explain the topic

c. Explain the position

(1 paragraph)

2. Background information 

a. Include two (2) research pap3rs that give basic information to defend the position. 

Example: According to Smith (2021)……

(1 paragraph)

3. Thesis

a. Expand the information to defend the position whit:

i . Genetic Consequences

ii. Ethics

iii. Lack of technology

b.  Thesis statement (Must be clear, specific, and easy to read)

(1 paragraph)

4. Arguments develop

a. Briefly give a general statement

b. Briefly give scientific information about the topic and position

c. Reason 1: Give one MAJOR detail that supports the thesis according to one research

i. Evidence 1: Give one MINOR detail as to why reason 1 supports the thesis

ii. Evidence 2: Give a second, MINOR detail as to why reason 1 supports the thesis

iii. Evidence 3: Give a third, MINOR detail as to why reason 1 supports the thesis

(1 paragraph)

d. Reason 2: Give a second MAJOR detail that supports the thesis according to one research (1 paragraph)

i.Evidence 1: Give one MINOR detail as to why reason 2 supports the thesis

ii. Evidence 2.: Give a second, MINOR detail as to why reason 2 supports the thesis

iii. Evidence 3: Give a third, MINOR detail as to why reason 2 supports the thesis

e. Reason 3: Give a third MAJOR detail that supports your thesis

i. Evidence 1: Give one MINOR detail as to why reason 3 supports the thesis

ii. Evidence 2: Give a second, MINOR detail as to why reason 3 supports the thesis

iii. Evidence 3: Give a third, MINOR detail as to why reason 3 supports the thesis

(1 paragraph)

5. Refuting Opponents Arguments

a. Make an introduction of argument from opposition (What they say)

b.    Opposing view 1: Give a valid counterargument to the position

i.    Refutation 1: Give a reason as to why opposing view 1 is inferior to  the position

c. Opposing view 2: Give a second counterargument to  the position

i.    Refutation 1: Give a reason as to why opposing view 2 is inferior to  the position

(1 paragraph)

6.  Conclusion:

a. Explain what the importance of your issue is in a larger context. 

c. Reiterate why the topic is worth caring about.

d. Propose solutions for the future of the topic.  

e. Show benefits of the position

Part 2: Annotated bibliography

Question: Should gene-editing be abolished?

Position: Agree

Topic: Gene-editing  should be abolished

Use only the 8 attached documents to make an annotated bibliography

1. Half page for each article

2. Answer the following questions on a line at the end of the analysis of each article

to. What is the source about?

b. How and where do you plan to use the information in the research pap3r?

c. How do you know if the source is credible?

i. Who is the author, publisher, or what database is it from?