Hand hygiene is central to public health and safe healthcare practice, and its impact on the control and spread of infections is even more apparent in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Research shows that hand hygiene is the single most

important strategy for preventing and reducing the spread of microorganisms (Schweizer et al, 2014; Luangasanatip et al, 2015); and occupies a unique position within the field of healthcare and patient safety, in that it is universally relevant to staff and patients at every healthcare encounter. The important role of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of microorganisms has been especially highlighted most recently following the global pandemic of the coronavirus causing COVID-19, which was initially identified in Wuhan, China, in late December 2019. The ability of hand hygiene, including hand washing or the use of alcohol-based hand sanitisers, to prevent infections is related to the reduction in the number of viable pathogens that transiently contaminate the hands. Following the initial outbreak, COVID-19-specific infection prevention measures were rapidly introduced, with hand hygiene for infection prevention forming a crucial part of the international response to the global emergence of COVID-19. Interestingly, the focus and effort of COVID-19 public health campaigns and health professional education has been on hand washing, with no or little emphasis on hand drying. Historically, the frequency of hand hygiene among healthcare staff and the wider public has been suboptimal and while compliance with hand-hygiene practices has improved, especially in healthcare settings and hospitals where promotion has been implemented (Schweizer et al, 2014; Luangasanatip et al, 2015), it remains that behaviours fall short of the necessary expectations. This is particularly true for hand drying, as strategies to improve behavioural compliance with hand hygiene remain limited in their effectiveness in that they fail to consider this vital, although much neglected, aspect of hand-hygiene practice.

Hand drying is imperative in that it not only maintains and supports skin integrity (Jungbauer et al, 2004a; 2004b; Snelling et al, 2011; Behroozy and Keegel, 2014; Jensen et al, 2015), but also decreases microbial count on the skin surface (Merry et al, 2001; Snelling et al, 2011; Jensen et al, 2015). Human skin is a relatively dry environment, and this helps to limit the types and numbers of microorganisms that can survive on it. Thus if hands are wet and remain wet for a considerable period of time, this has a significant impact on skin condition and on microbial

COVID-19 and hand hygiene: the vital importance of hand dryingJohn Gammon and Julian Hunt

ABSTRACTThe significance of hand hygiene for preventing the transmission of microorganisms and reducing the spread of infection has been brought into sharp focus following the global coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. In the months since the initial outbreak, international public health campaigns and practitioner education has concentrated on hand washing and hand sanitising, with very little reference to hand drying, if any at all. However, hand drying is integral to effective hand hygiene, and is important in controlling the spread of microorganisms and maintaining healthy skin integrity. This research commentary will focus on two issues of importance with regards to hand drying: microbial transmission and skin irritation, with implications for healthcare practitioners and practice considered. It is argued that a more holistic approach to hand hygiene must be the ambition if health professional and public behaviour is to become embedded and sustained.

Key words: COVID-19 ■ Hand hygiene ■ Hand drying ■ Microbial transmission ■ Skin irritation ■ Healthcare staff

John Gammon, Professor, Infection Prevention, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University

Julian Hunt, Research Officer, Infection Prevention, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, [email protected]

Accepted for publication: August 2020

load and transfer. This article draws on a historical trajectory of research among authors in the area of infection prevention (see for example: Gammon, 1998; Gammon and Hunt, 2018a; 2018b; 2019; Gammon et al, 2019a; 2019b) in order stimulate debate regarding the significance of hand drying in the process of hand hygiene.

Implications for health professionals and practiceResidual moisture on the hands and the amount of time hands are wet or exposed to wetness, are factors of importance in terms of hand hygiene and infection prevention. Water exposure can cause swelling and shrinking of the stratum corneum and can lead to hand dermatitis. The nature of clinical practice means that the hands of healthcare staff are frequently exposed to wetness, often referred to as wet work, increasing the risk of skin irritation and microbial transmission. The literature

British Journal of Nursing, 2020, Vol 29, No 17 1003

FOCUS©

202

0 M

A H

ealthca

re L

td

defines wet work as activities where healthcare staff have to immerse their hands in liquids for more than 2 hours per shift, wear waterproof (occlusive) gloves for a corresponding amount of time, or wash their hands more than 20 times per shift. In similar ways, Fartasch (2016) defined wet work as unprotected exposure to humid environments/water, high frequencies of hand-washing procedures or prolonged glove occlusion, all of which is believed to cause irritant contact dermatitis in a variety of occupations. Further studies note the effect that wet hands have on the skin condition, and research has found that wet work exposure is a major risk factor for hand dermatitis and irritation (Behroozy and Keegel, 2014; Papadatou et al, 2018) and increases the risk of microbial transmission (Patrick et al, 1997; Ataee et al, 2017). Therefore, this article will focus on two issues of importance with regards to hand drying and the implications for healthcare staff and practice: microbial transmission and skin irritation.

Wet hands increase the likelihood of microbial transmissionThere is an increased likelihood of microbial transmission when hands are wet or damp, rather than dry (Gould and Ream, 1994; Patrick et al, 1997; Merry et al, 2001; Ataee et al, 2017). Microorganisms of the normal skin flora are adapted to live in the environment, while other microbes can die within a matter of minutes to hours of contact. Significantly, if microorganisms are suspended in a fluid (eg water, blood, saliva or milk) when in contact with the skin, it affects the rate at which drying occurs, which extends the time microbes survive on the skin. Microorganisms within droplets of moisture on the surface of the hands may consequently be afforded a degree of protection from perishing on a dry surface, and the longer they can survive there, the greater the chance of them being transmitted and cross-infection occurring. In this way, Merry et al (2001) stated that microbial transfer and touch contamination greatly increases when hands are wet and significantly reduce with thorough hand drying. In their study, Ataee et al (2017) suggested that the released amount of microbial flora from wet hands is more than 10 times that from dry hands. Patrick et al (1997) noted that the single most important determinant of the number of microorganisms translocated from hands to equipment or environmental surfaces, was the extent of residual moisture remaining on hands after washing. They established a clear correlation between residual moisture on the hands and microbial transmission with touch contact.

The effects of wet hands on skin integrityHealth professionals are at high risk of developing occupational hand dermatitis as a consequence of frequent exposure to ‘wet work’, soaps, detergents and antiseptics (Jungbauer et al, 2004a; 2004b; Snelling et al, 2011; Behroozy and Keegel, 2014) owing to the nature of mandatory hygiene procedures, coupled with ineffective hand drying and/or the use of hand gloves. The symptoms of hand dermatitis include dryness, irritation, itching, cracking and bleeding, which are made worse by the removal of natural skin moisturisers, and in turn can lead to altered and higher numbers of microbes colonising the skin surface.

Among healthcare staff, nurses are particularly at risk of hand dermatitis, where the work performed requires many cycles of hand washing per hour. It is estimated that around 1000 nurses develop work-related irritant contact dermatitis each year in the UK (Behroozy and Keegel, 2014). Visser et al (2014) measured the effects of wet work exposure among nurses and found that, in year 1 of the study, the prevalence of developing hand eczema was 23%, in year 2 it was 25% and in year 3 prevalence increased to 31%. In an earlier prevalence study of irritant contact dermatitis in health professionals by Larson (2001), the figures ranged between 10 and 45%. The consequence, aside from the health impact for the health professional, is an increased likelihood of noncompliance to hand-hygiene practice recommendations (Gould and Ream, 1994) and consequently cross-infection.

In addition to regular hand washing, healthcare staff are exposed to further risks of skin irritation (eg glove use, antiseptics and detergents) (Antonov et al, 2013; Fartasch, 2016), which can result in wet hands and skin breakdown (Antonov et al, 2013; Tiedemann et al, 2016; Fartasch, 2016). The use of gloves, which can generate heat and moisture that collects as a result of the occlusive effect of the gloves, can facilitate the growth of microorganisms and the activation of other potential irritants, thus further increasing the potential of environmental contamination and cross-infection (Jungbauer et al, 2004a; 2004b; Behroozy and Keegel, 2014). In their study, Tiedemann et al (2016) concluded that studies investigating the combined effect of occlusion and exposure to detergents indicate that occlusion significantly increases damage to the skin barrier. In similar ways, Hamnerius et al (2018) noted that hand washing with soap and use of disposable gloves was associated with the occurrence of self-reported hand irritation in a dose-dependent way. Therefore, the use of occlusive protection gloves has to be carefully considered to avoid over use and interventional studies such as Gasparini et al (2019), have been shown to be beneficial with regards to raising awareness of appropriate glove use and hand washing among staff.

The significance of hand dryingThese two critical factors emphasise the need for hands to be effectively dried as part of the hand-hygiene process and particularly in outbreak situations, when episodes of hand hygiene markedly increase. However, to what extent are hands effectively dried? Research to understand the duration and efficacy of hand drying is limited. Since the wetness of hands greatly influences microbial transmission, drying methods (Mutters and Warnes, 2019) and hand drying efficacy (Gammon and Hunt, 2019) after hand washing should be considered as an essential part of hand-hygiene procedures and recommended for the public during community epidemics and pandemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Wet or damp hands, as a result of ineffective drying, can lead to skin irritation, which in turn leads to higher numbers of microorganisms colonising the skin and facilitating increased spread. Patrick et al (1997) noted that, by drying the hands thoroughly, the number of microbes transferring by direct contact to skin, food or objects can be reduced by the order of 99%.

1004 British Journal of Nursing, 2020, Vol 29, No 17

FOCUS

© 2

020

MA

Hea

lthca

re L

td

Consequently, the duration and efficacy of different drying methods is important in preventing wet hands, maintaining healthy skin integrity and controlling the spread of microorganisms. In their review of the literature, Gammon and Hunt (2019) identified 13 studies assessing the capacity of different hand-drying methods to translocate and disperse microorganisms into the immediate environment and to other persons. Nine of the identified studies noted that jet air dryers and warm air dryers resulted in greater microbial dispersion when compared to paper towels. A recent study by Best et al (2018) investigated options for hand drying in hospital washrooms. They noted multiple examples of significant differences in the extent of surface microbial contamination, with higher levels of contamination being measured in hospital washrooms using a jet air dryers compared with those using paper towels. Best et al (2018) concluded that jet air dryers may not be suitable for settings where microbial cross-contamination risks are high, including hospital settings. Redway and Fawdar (2009) and Hanna et al (1996) suggested that paper towels are more effective in removing all types of microbes on the hands, particularly the fingertips, and that jet air dryers and hot air dryers increased all types of bacteria on the hands. According to Todd et al (2010), drying hands with a towel removes pathogens first by friction during rubbing with the drying material and then by wicking away the moisture into that material. They concluded that the use of paper towels should be encouraged. Conversely research by Ansari et al (1991) and Suen et al (2019), examined the ability of different drying methods to reduce microbial load on the hands and concluded that the use of jet air dryers is the best method to eliminate microbes on hands.

ConclusionIt is clear that dry hands are safer hands. Wet hands are an infection risk, increasing the potential for microbial transmission and dispersion, skin irritation for healthcare staff, harm to patients and environmental contamination. Research demonstrates that effective hand drying contributes to a reduction in the number of microbes on the surface of hands and, therefore, hand drying is integral to the process of hand hygiene, which aims to optimise the removal of potentially pathogenic microorganisms and maintain skin integrity. Hand drying prevents moisture acting as a bridge, allowing microorganisms to be translocated and environmental surfaces contaminated. Understanding this aspect of practice, together with associated risk factors such as glove use and exposure to antiseptics, is crucial in determining the potential for cross-infection and the wellbeing of healthcare staff. Many hand-hygiene educational interventions and public health campaigns present an imbalanced emphasis on the formative steps of handwashing, neglecting the imperative for thorough hand drying. Thus, although there is awareness of the importance of hand hygiene, practice does not convey understanding of the significance of hand-drying duration and efficacy among healthcare staff and the wider public. Indeed, the public health messaging associated with the COVID-19 pandemic has made very little reference to hand drying, if any at all. A holistic approach to hand hygiene must be the ambition so that health professional and public hand-hygiene behaviour becomes embedded and is sustained. BJN

Declaration of interest: none

Ansari SA, Springthorpe VS, Sattar SA, Tostowaryk W, Wells GA. Comparison of cloth, paper, and warm air drying in eliminating viruses and bacteria from washed hands. Am J Infect Control. 1991;19(5):243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-6553(05)80256-1

Antonov D, Kleesz P, Elsner P, Schliemann S. Impact of glove occlusion on cumulative skin irritation with or without hand cleanser-comparison in an experimental repeated irritation model. Contact Dermat. 2013;68(5):293–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12028

Ataee R, Ataee M, Tavana AM, Salesi M. Bacteriological aspects of hand washing: A key for health promotion and infections control. Int J Prev Med. 2017;8(1):16. https://doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.201923

Behroozy A, Keegel TG. Wet-work exposure: a main risk factor for occupational hand dermatitis. Saf Health Work. 2014;5(4):175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.08.001

Best E, Parnell P, Couturier J et al. Environmental contamination by bacteria in hospital washrooms according to hand-drying method: a multi-centre study. J Hosp Infect. 2018;100(4):469–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2018.07.002

Fartasch M. Wet work and barrier function. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2016;49:144–151. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441590

Fartasch M, Taeger D, Broding HC et al. Evidence of increased skin irritation after wet work: impact of water exposure and occlusion. Contact Dermat. 2012;67(4):217–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02063.x

Gammon J. Analysis of the stressful effects of hospitalisation and source isolation on coping and psychological constructs. Int J Nurs Pract. 1998;4(2):84–96. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-172X.1998.00084.x

Gammon J, Hunt J. Source isolation and patient wellbeing in healthcare settings. Br J Nurs. 2018a;27(2):88–91. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2018.27.2.88

Gammon J, Hunt J. A review of isolation practices and procedures in healthcare settings. Br J Nurs. 2018b;27(3):137–140. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2018.27.3.137

Gammon J, Hunt J. The neglected element of hand hygiene—significance of hand drying, efficiency of different methods and clinical implication: a review. J Infect Prev. 2019;20(2):66–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757177418815549

Gammon J, Hunt J, Williams S, Daniel S, Rees S, Matthewson S. Infection prevention control and organisational patient safety culture within the context of isolation: study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019a;19(1):296. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4126-x

Gammon J, Hunt J, Musselwhite C. The stigmatisation of source isolation: a literature review. J Res Nurs. 2019b;24(8):677–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987119845031

Gasparini G, Carmisciano L, Giberti I, Murgioni F, Parodi A, Gallo R. ‘HEALTHY HANDS’. A pilot study for the prevention of chronic hand eczema in healthcare workers of an Italian University Hospital. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. June 12 2019; epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-0488.19.06220-5

Gould D, Ream E. Nurses’ views of infection control: an interview study. J Adv Nurs. 1994;19(6):1121–1131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01196.x

Hamnerius N, Svedman C, Bergendorff O, Björk J, Bruze M, Pontén A. Wet work exposure and hand eczema among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(2):452–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15813

Hanna PJ, Richardson BJ, Marshall M. A comparison of the cleaning efficiency of three common hand drying methods. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1996;11(1):37–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047322X.1996.10389121

Jensen DA, Danyluk MD, Harris LJ, Schaffner DW. Quantifying the effect of hand wash duration, soap use, ground beef debris, and drying methods on the removal of Enterobacter aerogenes on hands. J Food Prot. 2015;78(4):685–690. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-245

Jungbauer FHW, Van Der Harst JJ, Schuttelaar ML, Groothoff JW, Coenraads PJ. Characteristics of wet work in the cleaning industry. Contact Dermat. 2004a;51(3):131–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00421.x

Jungbauer FHW, Lensen GJ, Groothoff JW, Coenraads PJ. Exposure of the hands to wet work in nurses. Contact Dermat. 2004b;50(4):225–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.0314.x

Luangasanatip N, Hongsuwan M, Limmathurotsakul D et al. Comparative efficacy of interventions to promote hand hygiene in hospital: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;351:h3728. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3728

Larson E. Hygiene of the skin: when is clean too clean? Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(2):225–230. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0702.010215

Merry AF, Miller TE, Findon G, Webster CS, Neff SPW. Touch contamination levels during anaesthetic procedures and their relationship to hand hygiene procedures: a clinical audit. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87(2):291–294. https://doi.

British Journal of Nursing, 2020, Vol 29, No 17 1005

FOCUS©

202

0 M

A H

ealthca

re L

td

org/10.1093/bja/87.2.291Mutters R, Warnes SL. The method used to dry washed hands affects the

number and type of transient and residential bacteria remaining on the skin. J Hosp Infect. 2019;101(4):408–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2018.12.005

Papadatou Z, Williams H, Cooper K. Effectiveness of interventions for preventing occupational irritant hand dermatitis. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Reports. 2018;16(6):1398–1417. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003405

Patrick DR, Findon G, Miller TE. Residual moisture determines the level of touch-contact-associated bacterial transfer following hand washing. Epidemiol Infect. 1997;119(3):319–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268897008261

Redway K, Fawdar S. A comparative study of three different hand drying methods: paper towel, warm air dryer, jet air dryer. European Tissue Symposium/University of Westminster. 2009. https://tinyurl.com/y5ue7ccw (accessed 8 September 2020)

Schweizer ML, Reisinger HS, Ohl M et al. Searching for an optimal hand hygiene bundle: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(2):248–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit670

Snelling AM, Saville T, Stevens D, Beggs CB. Comparative evaluation of the hygienic efficacy of an ultra-rapid hand dryer vs conventional warm air hand dryers. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;110(1):19–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04838.x

Suen LKP, Lung VYT, Boost MV, Au-Yeung CH, Siu GKH. Microbiological evaluation of different hand drying methods for removing bacteria from washed hands. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):13754. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50239-4

Tiedemann D, Clausen ML, John SM, Angelova-Fischer I, Kezic S, Agner T. Effect of glove occlusion on the skin barrier. Contact Dermat. 2016;74(1):2–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12470

Todd ECD, Michaels BS, Smith D, Greig JD, Bartleson CA. Outbreaks where food workers have been implicated in the spread of foodborne disease. Part 9. Washing and drying of hands to reduce microbial contamination. J Food Prot. 2010;73(10):1937–1955. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-73.10.1937

Visser MJ, Verberk MM, van Dijk FJH, Bakker JG, Bos JD, Kezic S. Wet work and hand eczema in apprentice nurses; part I of a prospective cohort study. Contact Dermat. 2014;70(1):44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12131

KEY POINTS ■ Public health messaging associated with the COVID-19 pandemic has made

very little reference to hand drying, if any at all

■ Many hand hygiene educational interventions present an imbalanced emphasis on the formative steps of handwashing, neglecting the imperative for thorough hand drying

■ Hand drying is integral to the process of hand hygiene

■ Wet hands are an infection risk, increasing the potential for microbial transmission and dispersion, skin irritation for healthcare staff, harm to patients and environmental contamination

■ A holistic approach to hand hygiene must be the ambition so that practitioner and public behaviour becomes embedded and is sustained

CPD reflective questions

■ What is the relevance of efficient hand drying after washing to the effectiveness of hand hygiene and infection prevention within your clinical setting and healthcare more widely?

■ Are you at all times aware of when, how and why hand hygiene is essential?

■ In what ways do you ensure optimal hand hygiene practice for yourself and colleagues, including hand drying?

■ What is your understanding of the implications for yourself, colleagues, patients and wider infection prevention practice if adherences to hand hygiene, including effective hand drying, are not followed?

WRITE FOR US

[email protected] 020 7738 5454 @BJNursing

British Journal of Nursing (BJN) is always looking for new authors for the journal. Writing an article is a great way to invest in your CPD, enhance your CV, and make your contribution to nursing’s evidence base.

Find out more: magonlinelibrary.com/page/authors

1006 British Journal of Nursing, 2020, Vol 29, No 17

FOCUS

© 2

020

MA

Hea

lthca

re L

td

Copyright of British Journal of Nursing is the property of Mark Allen Publishing Ltd and itscontent may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without thecopyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or emailarticles for individual use.