How We Hire Writers

custom writing

All applicants go through a series of tests that check their level of English and knowledge of formatting styles. The applicant is also required to present a sample of writing to the Evaluation Department. If you wish to find out more about the procedure, check out the whole process.

How We Ensure Quality

Our Quality Control Department checks every single order for formatting, style, word usage, and authenticity. This lets us deliver certified assignment assistance that has no Internet rivals.

human trafficing

Each student will complete a Human Trafficking presentation. Students will develop a persuasive presentation about a human trafficking topic and how it relates to an audience of interest either ones personal community or professional community. The presentation should be submitted in PowerPoint form and must include recorded audio narration for each slide or typed narration in the notes section of each slide. The narration should expand upon the information that is on each slide and students should not read each slide. The presentation should include creative and relevant graphics that will enhance the engagement of the audience. APA style in text citation or APA referencing should be included on each slide.

Include the following sections in your presentation:

Introduction
Literature Review
Discussion & Reflection
Conclusion

Rubric
Human Trafficking Presentation Rubric (1) (1) (2) (1) (1)
Human Trafficking Presentation Rubric (1) (1) (2) (1) (1)
Criteria    Ratings    Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction: This section is an introduction of the issuewhat it is and why it is important. The review should be clear, and well organized. All information must be paraphrased or properly quoted on the slides; however, only minimal quotes should be included.
3.0 pts
There is a thorough introduction of the issue.
2.0 pts
The introduction of the issue is fairly comprehensive and organized but the use of source information could be improved and/or referencing or in-text citation contains errors.
1.0 pts
The introduction of the issue is included, but is limited. The introduction does not include a clear description of the issue.
0.0 pts
Section not included and/or section does not contain the information appropriate for this section and/or contains substantial errors.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review: This section is a review of the sources where main points from the sources are emphasized. Proper APA in-text citation or referencing must be included on the slides.
3.0 pts
The review of literature is thorough and clear. The sources are current and relevant and the student integrated the important points of the sources with the overall point of the presentation. Referencing and in-text citation is correct.
2.0 pts
The review of literature is fairly comprehensive and organized but the use of source information could be improved and/or referencing or in-text citation contains errors.
1.0 pts
The review of literature is included, but is limited. The review does not include a clear description of the health issue and/or material has been copied or quoted heavily from the original source and/or proper referencing or citation has not been included and/or the sources are not appropriate or reputable or current sources.
0.0 pts
Section not included and/or section does not contain the information appropriate for this section and/or contains substantial errors.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion & Reflection: This section is a discussion of the importance of the knowledge from the presentation to ones personal or professional community.
3.0 pts
There is a thorough discussion of the issue.
2.0 pts
The discussion of the issue is fairly comprehensive and organized but the emphasis on the topics importance and relevancy to ones community can be improved.
1.0 pts
The discussion of the issue is included, but is limited.
0.0 pts
Section not included and/or section does not contain the information appropriate for this section and/or contains substantial errors.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion: This section is a conclusion of main points throughout the presentation and how these point can be used towards advocacy and change.
3.0 pts
There is a thorough conclusion of the issue and implications for the future.
2.0 pts
The conclusion and future implications of the issue is fairly comprehensive and organized but the content can be improved.
1.0 pts
The conclusion and future implications of the issue is included, but is limited.
0.0 pts
Section not included and/or section does not contain the information appropriate for this section and/or contains substantial errors.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences: This section references all sources used in the presentation using correct APA style.
3.0 pts
This section uses APA style and includes only sources used in the presentation.
2.0 pts
This section includes an incomplete list of sources and it does not follow APA style.
1.0 pts
This section contains sources that are not included in the presentation.
0.0 pts
This section is not included and/or contains substantial errors in APA style and/or does not follow APA style.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Style & Organization of Slides This includes grammar, clarity of writing, use of language (i.e. students should write in a professional voice), general errors including typographical errors.
3.0 pts
The presentation is focused throughout. There is a good organizational structure. There are no or extremely few mechanical and grammatical errors. Slide information is well organized.
2.0 pts
Generally, the presentation is focused and ideas are clear and well organized. There are very few mechanical and grammatical errors and they do not detract from the authors ideas. Amount of information on the slide is adequately presented and organized.
1.0 pts
There are some problems with writing style, organization, and clarity. Problems with grammar and mechanics are evident throughout and/or there is too much information on the slides or the information is not well organized.
0.0 pts
There are substantial errors in the presentation.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNarration: This includes the narration of each slide through audio narration or written narration on the notes section of each slide.
3.0 pts
Narration of the slides is effective, thorough, and clear and further adds to the content on the slides.
2.0 pts
Narration adds to the information of the slides and further explains the slides somewhat.
1.0 pts
Narration is unclear and insufficient and/or student read from slides and did not include any supplemental information in the narration.
0.0 pts
No narration included.
3.0 pts

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes