How We Hire Writers

custom writing

All applicants go through a series of tests that check their level of English and knowledge of formatting styles. The applicant is also required to present a sample of writing to the Evaluation Department. If you wish to find out more about the procedure, check out the whole process.

How We Ensure Quality

Our Quality Control Department checks every single order for formatting, style, word usage, and authenticity. This lets us deliver certified assignment assistance that has no Internet rivals.

MemotoCIOonSuccessCriteriaforEnterpriseSystemImplementationandEA.docx

.

Remember to correctly cite and reference all sources. Since you are writing a memo, you should use in-text citations and list the references on a separate page at the end.

After your individual assignment has been submitted, you will work with your group to select a set of recommendations for a successful implementation that will become a part of your Group Project 2, the executive briefing.

Note: The filename of your paper should include your last name. An example would be: Smith_Memo.doc.

Grading Rubric

Your work will be graded according to the rubric below.

Criteria

90-100%

Far Above Standards

80-89%

Above Standards

70-79%

Meets Standards

60-69%

Below Standards

< 60%

Well Below Standards

Possible Points

Introduction

5 Points

There is an effective introduction to the memo, stating the purpose, using sophisticated writing.

4 Points

There is a clearly written introduction to the memo, stating the purpose, using effective writing.

3.5 Points

The introduction adequately sets the stage for the memo.

3 Points

The introduction does not adequately set the stage for the memo.

0-2 Points

No introduction is provided or little effort is shown.

5

Criteria

18-20 Points

More than 7 criteria for successful implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) are identified. Each of the criteria is thoroughly explained and each is very clearly applicable to enterprise system implementation success. Includes a thoughtful explanation on how the success criteria relates to enterprise architecture. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of course concepts, analysis, critical thinking and synthesis.

16-17 Points

More than 7 criteria for successful implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) are identified. Each of the criteria is clearly explained and each is applicable to enterprise system implementation success. Includes a good explanation on how the success criteria relates to enterprise architecture. Demonstrates a good understanding of course concepts, analysis, critical thinking and synthesis.

At least 7 criteria for successful implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) are identified, explained, and are applicable to enterprise system implementation success, and may demonstrate an adequate understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking. Some discussion on how the success criteria relates to enterprise architecture.

12-13 Points

Fewer than 7 criteria for successful implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) are identified. Some of the criteria may not be clearly explained, and/or may not be applicable to enterprise system implementation success, and/or may not demonstrate an adequate understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking. Little to no mention of how this success criteria relates to enterprise architecture.

0-11 Points

Few or no success criteria applicable to enterprise system and enterprise architecture implementa-tion are identified and explained, or are not relevant.

20

Application of Criteria

45-50 Points

The application in a successful implementation of enterprise systems is fully and clearly described for more than 7 criteria. Each of the criteria is appropriately related to implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) and to satisfying the enterprise architecture; and demonstrates sophisticated incorporation of course concepts and research, analysis, critical thinking and synthesis.

40-44 Points

The application in a successful implementation of enterprise systems is clearly described for more than 7 criteria. Each of the criteria is appropriately related to implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) and to satisfying the enterprise architecture; and demonstrates effective incorporation of course concepts and research, analysis, critical thinking and synthesis.

35-39 Points

The application in a successful implementation of enterprise systems is described for at least 7 criteria. The explanations relate the criteria to implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) and satisfying the enterprise architecture, and demonstrate adequate incorporation of course concepts and research, analysis, and critical thinking.

30-34 Points

The application in a successful implementation of enterprise systems may be only partially described and/or fewer than 7 criteria may be discussed. The criteria may not be appropriately related to implementation of enterprise systems (in the category assigned) and satisfying the enterprise architecture, and/or may not demonstrate adequate incorporation of course concepts and research, analysis, and critical thinking.

0-29 Points

The explanations for application of the criteria do not relate to successful implementa-tion of enterprise systems, or are missing; or too few criteria are included.

50

External Research

14-15 Points

More than three scholarly sources other than the class resources are incorporated and used effectively, contextualized, appropriately researched and supported, and synthesized with original arguments. Sources used are credible, relevant, and timely. Proper APA style is used for citations and references.

12-13 Points

More than three scholarly sources other than the class resources are incorporated and used effectively, appropriately researched and supported, and support original arguments. Sources used are credible, relevant, and timely. Proper APA style is used for citations and references.

11 Points

Three scholarly sources other than the class resources are properly incorporated and used. Uses APA format for references and citations.

10 Points

Three or fewer sources other than the class resources may be used; may not be scholarly sources; may not be properly incorporated or used to support arguments; may rely too heavily on the reporting of external sources, and/or are not effective or appropriate; and/or are not credible, relevant, or timely. May not use APA format.

0-9 Points

No external research is incorporated or reference listed is not cited within text.

15

Memo Format

9-10 Points

Memo reflects effective organization and sophisticated writing; correct structure, grammar, and spelling; presented in a professional format using Word memo template.

8 Points

Memo reflects effective organization; has few errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; presented in a professional format using Word memo template.

7 Points

Memo has some organization; may have some errors in sentence structure, grammar and spelling; is in Word memo template.

6 Points

Memo is not well organized, and/or contains several grammar and/or spelling errors; and/or is not in Word memo template.

0-5 Points

Memo is extremely poorly written and does not convey the information.

10

 

 

 

TOTAL Points Possible

100

03/15/2019

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes