How We Hire Writers

custom writing

All applicants go through a series of tests that check their level of English and knowledge of formatting styles. The applicant is also required to present a sample of writing to the Evaluation Department. If you wish to find out more about the procedure, check out the whole process.

How We Ensure Quality

Our Quality Control Department checks every single order for formatting, style, word usage, and authenticity. This lets us deliver certified assignment assistance that has no Internet rivals.

MGT672_CTWritingRubric_Mod10.docx

MGT672

Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 10

Exceeds Expectation

Meets Expectation

Below Expectation

Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis

21-25 Points

16-20 Points

11-15 Points

6-10 Points

Requirements

Exceeds Expectation -Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Meets Expectation – Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Below Expectation – Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Limited Evidence – Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

21-25 Points

16-20 Points

11-15 Points

6-10 Points

Content

Exceeds Expectation – Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions.

Meets Expectation – Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions.

Below Expectation – Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions.

Limited Evidence – Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions.

25-30 Points

19-24 Points

13-18 Points

7-12 Points

Analysis

Exceeds Expectation – Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of ethical leadership, concepts and applications.

Meets Expectation – Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of ethical leadership, concepts and applications.

Below Expectation – Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of ethical leadership, concepts and applications.

Limited Evidence – Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of ethical leadership, concepts and applications.

13-15 Points

10-12 Points

7-9 Points

4-6 Points

Sources

Exceeds Expectation – Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Meets Expectation – Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Below Expectation – Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Limited Evidence – Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes