Come up with a way someone harms you wrongfully(the example doesnt have to be true, just yours alone). Explain why its a harm and why its wrongful. How might this wronging be counteredwithout any transfer of money or property in line withLockean Reparation but not Aristotelian Corrective Justice? How might it be alternatively dealt withwithout any transfer of money or property sothat its corrective justice,but not Lockean reparation? Which of the two do you think is the better way to make up for what went wrong? Make a convincing argument for why its the better way.Finally, what change in thefacts of thescenario would change your view aboutwhich is better,andwhy?DUE: Tuesday, May 11th11:59pm,via submission to your TA(as she/he directs).LENGTH: Three (3) pages or less, double-spaced.