Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Name: NRNP_6665_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
·
·
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor |
In a 300- to 500-word blog post written for a patient and/or caregiver audience:• Explain signs and symptoms for the assigned diagnosis in children and adolescents. | 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response accurately and concisely explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. | 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response accurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. | 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. | 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing. |
· Explain pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for children and adolescents with the diagnosis. | 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response accurately and concisely explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. | 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response accurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. | 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. | 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing. |
· Explain appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. | 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response accurately and concisely explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. | 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response accurately explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. | 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. | 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing. |
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. | 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. | 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. | 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. | 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. |
Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors | 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors | 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors | 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list. | 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors | 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains one or two APA format errors | 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) APA format errors | 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) APA format errors |
Total Points: 100 |
Name: NRNP_6665_Week5_Assignment_Rubric