Answer some of these questions while referring to the readings.
Last week, we discussed how public opinion of science has been politicized over time. How does Gauchat elaborate on his earlier findings in Gauchat 2015? What does he have to say about the political and research funding implications of the publics trust in science?

In Medvetz 2008, how does Bourdieus theoretical framework clarify the role of and influences in private research and policy organizations?

In Leslie et al 2015, how do assumptions of innate brilliance influence the composition of different fields of experts? Is there such a thing as innate talent? Why or why not?

What are some of the challenges of understanding why women are underrepresented in STEM fields?