April 10th, 2022 
Teaching Project Rubric
Attachment 3
Based upon a deficit in an aggregate you identified in your Community Assessment, identify an area of teaching appropriate for the aggregate.
Part 1 & 2 emailed to clinical faculty 5 days before teaching.
Students’ Names:
Teaching Topic Based Upon Social and Health Problem:
Teaching Presentation
Exceptional | Average | Poor | Possible Points | |
Understanding of Material for the project | Demonstrates in-depth understanding of topic; thorough explanation to promote understanding ; presents most important content 15-20 points | Has good grasp of material: occasional gaps noted or unclear explanation; Presents core points well 15-10 points | Difficult to follow topics or to understand major points from the presentation 9-0 points | /20 |
General Content | Thorough, accurate, succinct, relevant information 10-8 points | Provides basic, accurate information 7-5 points | Lacking information and/or information is inaccurate and irrelevant 4-0 points | /10 |
The main project concept | Thorough, accurate, complete, relevant information based upon course content and readings 20-15 points | Provides basic, accurate information about project concepts based upon minimal mastery of course content and readings 15-9 points | Lacking information about project concepts or the information is inaccurate 8-0 points | /20 |
Audience understanding | Evaluates audience comprehension of content; audience demonstrates understanding 10-8 points | Evaluates audience comprehension of content; audience demonstrates minimal understanding 7-5 points | Does not evaluate audience understanding and/or audience does not adequately demonstrate understanding 4-0 points | /10 |
Audience participation | Encourage the audience to participate 10-8 points | Minimum audience participation 7-5 points | The audience did not participate or not encouraged 4-0 points | /10 |
Display of the Presentation
| Materials well developed. Easy to view & understand; creative use of graphics; written in presenter’s own words; few errors 20-15 points | Slides adequate for information; adequate graphics; some reproduction of other’s work; some errors 15-9 points | Information difficult to interpret from slides; graphics irrelevant or missing; work not original; many errors 8-0 points | /20 |
References | Reference using Footnote APA format adhered All references included and within 5 years All graphics with references 10-8 points | APA format attempted; 7-5 points | Incorrect format and references; used unapproved references and/or inappropriate or commercial sites; plagiarizes material 4-0 points | /10 |
Student reviewed grading / signature / date:
Posted in 